The Philosophy ArchiveThe Philosophy Archive
Back to Home
Concept or Thought Experiment

Buridan's Ass

A donkey caught between equal bales of hay becomes a philosopher’s nightmare: if reasons are perfectly balanced, what moves the will at all?

1301 – 1400Europe
Buridan's Ass

Quick Facts

Period
1301 – 1400
Region
Europe
Key Figures
Albert of Saxony, Jean Buridan, John Duns Scotus +2 more

Key Figures

The Story

This narrative combines documented history with dramatized scenes for storytelling purposes.

Timeline

Birth of Jean Buridan

**1300** — Jean Buridan is born in France, likely in or near the early fourteenth century that would shape his intellectual world. His later career at Paris would place him at the center of scholastic debates about motion, causation, and voluntary action.

Buridan enters the University of Paris milieu

**1320** — Buridan’s formation takes place in the disputational culture of the University of Paris, where Aristotle was studied through careful commentary and objection. This environment made extreme cases like equal alternatives philosophically useful rather than merely amusing.

Development of Buridan’s account of the will

**1330** — In his discussions of the soul and action, Buridan articulates a view of the will as a power capable of self-determination when reasons do not decisively incline the agent. The famous donkey image later attached to his name crystallizes this kind of case.

Buridan’s impetus theory gains prominence

**1335** — Buridan’s natural philosophy introduces impetus as a way of explaining continued motion after the mover is no longer in contact with the moved body. Though not the same as the will’s freedom, it shows the same explanatory style: motion can originate and then persist according to an inner condition.

Death of Jean Buridan

**1361** — Buridan dies, leaving behind a body of work that would remain influential in late medieval scholasticism. His name would later become attached to the donkey parable that made his problem famous far beyond the university.

Buridan’s ideas circulate through later medieval commentators

**1370** — Students and successors such as Albert of Saxony help transmit Buridan’s methods and problem-sets into broader scholastic and natural-philosophical discussion. The will, motion, and equality of reasons become shared points of reference in late medieval debate.

Birth of Martin Luther

**1483** — Luther’s arrival marks the beginning of a new theological context in which human agency would be argued over in relation to sin and grace. His criticisms would later reframe scholastic confidence in the will.

Luther and Erasmus debate the will

**1525** — The controversy over free will and bondage of the will brings older questions of agency into the Reformation spotlight. Even when not directly about Buridan, the debate renews the problem of whether the will can decide itself or must be determined by something prior.

Descartes and the early modern turn to mechanism

**1637** — Early modern philosophy increasingly explains natural motion in mechanical terms, which changes the background against which voluntary action is understood. Buridan’s question survives but now appears beside the problem of whether mind can resist a mechanized nature.

Modern analytic discussions of freedom revisit symmetry cases

**1954** — Philosophers of action and decision theory begin to treat tie-breaking and underdetermination as formal problems, echoing the structure of Buridan’s dilemma. The donkey becomes a classic way to ask whether reasons suffice for action.

Scholarly reassessment of Buridan’s psychology

**1994** — Late twentieth-century scholarship clarifies that the donkey is a later simplification of a richer medieval account of the will. This work distinguishes Buridan’s actual texts from the proverb that bears his name.

Buridan’s Ass remains a live philosophical test case

**2026** — The thought experiment continues to appear in discussions of free will, rational choice, and the problem of symmetric reasons. Its endurance shows that the medieval question is still ours: can a will choose without a reason?

Sources

  • primary_text
    Jean Buridan, Questions on Aristotle's De anima, trans. John A. Zupko and others (selected passages in scholarly editions)

    Primary source for Buridan's psychology of intellect and will.

  • primary_text
    Jean Buridan, Quaestiones super libros De generatione et corruptione

    Relevant for Buridan's natural philosophy and explanatory style.

  • reference_encyclopedia
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Medieval Theories of the Will"

    Overview of scholastic accounts of volition and freedom.

  • reference_encyclopedia
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Jean Buridan"

    Scholarly overview of Buridan's life and thought.

  • reference_encyclopedia
    Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Jean Buridan"

    Accessible overview with discussion of the donkey problem and impetus theory.

  • scholarly_article
    John M. Rist, "Buridan's Ass: A Problem in the Theory of Free Choice"

    Classic discussion of the thought experiment and its philosophical significance.

  • scholarly_book
    Jack Zupko, John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master

    Major modern study of Buridan's intellectual context and doctrines.

  • scholarly_book
    Anneliese Maier, On Buridan's Theory of Impetus

    Important historical study of Buridan's natural philosophy.

  • primary_text
    Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, I-II, questions on the will and choice

    Essential medieval background on intellect, will, and choice.

  • primary_text
    John Duns Scotus, Ordinatio / lectures on the will

    Key medieval account of self-determining will in relation to Buridan's problem.

Explore Related Archives

The philosophies documented here connect to the broader record. Explore the context through our sister archives.