The Philosophy ArchiveThe Philosophy Archive
Back to Home
Concept or Thought Experiment

Problem of Evil

If a good God is also all-powerful, then every teardrop becomes a theorem. The problem of evil is philosophy’s oldest and most relentless attempt to turn suffering into an argument.

400 BC – presentEurope
Problem of Evil

Quick Facts

Period
400 BC – present
Region
Europe
Key Figures
Alvin Plantinga, Augustine of Hippo, David Hume +3 more

Key Figures

The Story

This narrative combines documented history with dramatized scenes for storytelling purposes.

Timeline

The Book of Job crystallizes righteous suffering

**400 BC** — The Hebrew poetic drama places innocent suffering at the center of theological reflection. Its refusal to collapse pain into simple punishment becomes one of the deepest antecedents of later philosophical treatments of evil.

Plotinus develops evil-as-privation

**300 AD** — In the Enneads, Plotinus argues that evil is not a positive substance but a lack of good and being. This Neoplatonic account will profoundly shape later Christian metaphysics.

Augustine writes against Manichaean dualism

**400 AD** — Across several works, Augustine rejects the idea that evil is an eternal rival principle to God. His account of privation and disordered will becomes foundational for Western theodicy.

Aquinas dies after systematizing providence and permissio

**1274** — The Summa Theologiae offers a mature scholastic framework in which God permits evil for the sake of a providential order. Later defenders of theism continue to draw on his distinctions between divine and creaturely causality.

Hume drafts the Dialogues on natural religion

**1739** — Hume’s skeptical exploration of design and suffering reframes the issue as an evidential challenge. The world’s defects become data in an argument about what sort of cause, if any, the world suggests.

Hegel reinterprets suffering within historical development

**1807** — Although not a philosopher of evil in the strict theological sense, Hegel’s thought influences later attempts to understand contradiction and suffering as moments within a larger rational process. His legacy helps shift some debates toward history and spirit.

Mackie publishes 'Evil and Omnipotence'

**1961** — This essay becomes a landmark of analytic philosophy of religion. It states the logical problem of evil with exceptional clarity and forces defenders to refine their position.

Plantinga publishes The Nature of Necessity and his free will defense

**1974** — Plantinga’s modal treatment shows that the logical problem of evil does not straightforwardly succeed. The debate thereafter turns toward evidential arguments and more careful modal reasoning.

Hick publishes Evil and the God of Love

**1966** — Hick’s soul-making theodicy revives an Irenaean approach in modern terms. He argues that a world with struggle may be necessary for mature moral and spiritual development.

The evidential problem of evil becomes standard in contemporary debate

**2001** — After Plantinga, philosophers increasingly focus on probabilistic versions of the argument, especially around natural evil, hiddenness, and the distribution of suffering. The issue remains central in analytic philosophy of religion.

Discussions of suffering intensify in public theology and trauma studies

**2017** — The problem of evil continues to shape conversation in theology, ethics, and trauma-informed philosophy. New attention is given to lament, solidarity, and the moral limits of explanation.

Plantinga’s death marks the close of an era in analytic theodicy

**2023** — His work had reshaped the logical problem of evil and inspired decades of debate. The question he helped clarify remains open, but the terms of its discussion were permanently altered.

Sources

Explore Related Archives

The philosophies documented here connect to the broader record. Explore the context through our sister archives.